This article dissects the use of expert commentary in court cases. Improper or uncertain expert opinions can create an unreliable source that might still be used in a court case. Number III directly related the topic to Dan White's trial

​

http://www-lexisnexis-com.libweb.uwlax.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/?verb=sr&csi=7341&sr=TITLE(The+Ethos+of+Expert+Witnesses+Confusing+the+Admissibility%2C+Sufficiency+and+Credibility+of+Expert+Testimony)%2BAND%2BDATE%2BIS%2B1998

​

​

Ray Sloan, who campaigned for Dan White, reminisces on his relationship with him and also the personality of Dan. Sloan feels responsible for the way Dan is seen, even now.

​

https://search-proquest-com.libweb.uwlax.edu/docview/367804821?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo 

​

​

This 2009 article digs at the trial and verdict. Paul Kassner points out some spots that the prosecution failed to emphasize that could have entirely changed the verdict. 

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-krassner/behind-the-infamous-twink_b_148474.html